Thursday, 14 November 2013

Time something was done - calling all plot owners

In the 1970s, Frank Chapman, of Australian Land Sales, established Wood and Leisure Land. It sold timeshares (at Plas Talgarth in Wales and Loch Rannoch in Scotland), and parcels of woodland (e.g. Baddengorm in Invernessshire, Cobairdy in Aberdeenshire - and ours).

Cartland Muir Plantation in Lanarkshire covers 202.6 acres. It was divided into 53 plots, 51 of which were to be sold off to investors. 50 were sold. Some of us bought more than one plot.

The proposed benefits were the freehold tenure of the land, with growing timber, which promised a long-term capital gain. In addition, there would be an income from thinnings and final felling - this was anticipated to start some 20 years after planting (i.e. in the case of most of the plantation, around 1988) and thereafter every five years until a clear felling some 60 years after planting (i.e. 2028 - or 2012 in the case of plots 1-7).

We were told that we might expect a yield over 20 years of between £750 and £1,780 per acre at 1973 prices - a return in real terms of between 5% and 12% per annum. Agricultural land was also increasing in value at the time.

Wood and Leisure Land managed the woods under a management agreement with the landowners, for a fee of £10 per acre per annum, plus VAT. The agreement was for an initial term of 15 years, renewable thereafter every five years.

In 1982, Frank Chapman sold his business to Barratt Developments, the builders. They had little interest in woodland, and their subsidiary Barratt International Resorts concentrated on timeshares (eventually being taken over by Macdonald Hotels between 1997 and 2003).

In 1989, Barratts wrote to plot-owners, saying that would not renew the management agreement. They planned to sell the woodland in complete plantations, subject to the agreement of all plot-owners.

In 1994, Barratts again wrote to say that they had engaged John Clegg and Co to try and sell Cartland Muir as a whole. John Clegg's valuation suggested that the 51 plots, for which the owners had paid some £74,000 in total (plus some £3,000 in conveyancing fees, plus over £32,500 in management fees) might realize some £65,000 on a sale.

Most, but not all, plot-owners agreed to this proposal, and forwarded their title deeds to Wood and Leisure Land's solicitors, Tods Murray.

In 2003, Tods Murray wrote to plot-owners who had deposited their deeds with them, describing a proposed sale to Community Windpower Ltd for £144,000, which, after expenses, might be an opportunity for investors to break even.

The idea of a wind farm on Cartland Muir met (unjustified) local opposition, however, and fell through.

As a result, we plot-owners are left with woods which are
  • unmanaged and in need of attention
  • not producing revenue from the sale of timber
  • practically unsaleable if the owners cannot establish a consortium of all of us
This is not a happy state of affairs, and we should combine to do something about it. Signify your support by commenting below, and let's try and get some solidarity to our approach. Tods Murray and John Clegg are doing excellent work, but they need our support and encouragement.

6 comments:

  1. Hi. Just come across this. I have a plot at Baddengorm which I inherited from my Dad. Feel equally frustrated by the whole thing but have made some efforts in the past to try and find other owners etc, to no avail, really. Happy to help you in your campaign......

    ReplyDelete
  2. I own a plot at Baddengorm. I can be contacted at timneilson@btinternet.com

    ReplyDelete
  3. By the way my email address is jo.jones125@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dear Mr. Davies,
    I assume you do not actually live here but just invested in some land to make some money. I do live here and have invested my life here so therefore not sure where your "unjustified" local opposition comes from to Cartland Muir windfarm. Could it have been that you might have made some monetary gain from a bad investment after all? We all know that speculating in any market is a risk and sometimes it goes sour. Community Windpower Ltd. are trying again in another area near your investment. No doubt you will support them.
    Suzanne Darroch

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am not sure that any of the fifty or so people who bought plots at Cartland Muir were "speculators" - we did not have a lot to invest, and we expected our trees to grow and produce timber. Forestry is no "riskier" than regular farming - our problem has been a lack of management.
      As nobody seems prepared to manage the woods on our behalf to produce timber, it is reasonable to want to sell our plots - not necessarily to the highest bidder. One possibility was to sell out to the Community Windpower Co-operative. I agree that my use of the word "unjustified" was subjective: I can see that the precise scheme proposed was unacceptable, but I cannot see why there was no possibility of negotiation, given the need for sources of sustainable energy and the nature of the location.
      I have no vested interest in Community Windpower, apart from a general interest in renewable energy. Indeed, I'd be much happier growing and selling timber. The blog isn't about wind farms, it is about managing woodland.
      My surname is Davie, by the way.

      Delete
  5. Tods Murray has been taken over by Sherpherd & Wedderburn, who are aware of the issue and have promised to get back to me. I'm representing my uncle, who is in a similar position to you. I'll report back if I get anywhere.

    ReplyDelete